Who are you? You know who you are. You've been coming to my blog everyday since Feb 14th. How did you know to check my other blog after three years of inactivity? Please let me know.
now that you know, you could delete this blog if you like. i'd hardly call it a blog. This might scare off potential readers if they see that you hunt your readers down and then wish them all the best.
your correction (to the typo) doesn't really go with the next sentence: i'd hardly call it a blog. did you mean to say "i'd hardly call it a post" too?
Yea and if you conclude with something completely illogical, the issue will be forgotten. The issue being, the certain habit of certain people to say others have done what they have done. So you tell me how I am, maybe that will also answer the question how you are.
i really made two typos.. wanted to write "post" both the times. since even after saying this you didn't seem to believe me, i wrote -
"Or, it can be that you want it to be me!".
this gives you yet another reason to hate me or not want to talk to me. So possibly for that you want it to be me. But then you wrote -
"It looks like a setup; I probably *made* you write that stuff!"
May be you feel I had latent hatred for you hidden deep in my subconscious and it came out with that comment. So in that way, you made me write it which is completely false cuz its not true.
Ok, all that sed, either im right(which i hope i am not) or im completely on a different page. In that case, do speak up.
btw, I asked "how are you?" cuz i really wanna know.
This seems heavy. I'm not aware of your "latent hatred" seeded "deep in [your] subconscious" yet but, I said:
"It looks like a setup; I probably *made* you write that stuff!"
because it seems u were gonna pull another Stalker-post-esque trick. Which is, stalking me, and then saying i hunted you down and terrorized you. On that vein, it seems natural to assume that, you would write "you shud delete your blog", then later turn it around to saying that I made you write that post. In other words, I make you do or I do what YOU do. Clear? Let me know if it confuses you. I'll be glad to break it down even further.
Actually, I will start writing in a few days because the situation I will be in is pretty interesting. It should be interesting for a reader too so check back next week.
so u'r ganna stai stubburn an kepo callin me a stolka ain't it ? so im a craizy complicaited stolka ... o wow, naw i evn saund lyc one. ok,,lets see what else i am.. how about u braik it daun evan furda. It confused me.
-----out of context begins-------
hear this out. its exciting. An Australian famous actor read a book written by a Bangladeshi. He loved it and wrote a letter to the author without any reply. However, he was on an auction one day and he met a woman. He asked her where she was from. She said from Bangladesh. He got all excited and said he read this book and is in love with the author and his work. She said she is his (the author's) personal secretary. Then finally he got to meet the author in NY and they sat and talked for several hours. The actor is HUGH JACKMAN and the book was Dr Yunus's autobiography. Cool aint it ?
You should have thought of that before you started this. You were the one who called me a stalker for wondering about my site traffic stats, saying that I should delete my blog because you felt hunted down and terrorized. Would the real stalker please stand up? Thank you.
accha, typo + typo = twipo... twipo twipo twipo twipo twipo twipo twipo twipo.. do i have to dance naked on the streets or regurgitate the ice cream that i just had or cook for the not needy to make u believe that it was a twipo ? name it !!
---out of context begins again-------
how is Purdue coming along ? studies, daily life ?
I think you should just own up, stand by what you said, instead of hiding under the possibility that a human error could have been made. It's just too convenient. Way too convenient.
Purdue is good. Studies and daily life is good too.
I'm sorry if I was vague: You are taking the easy way out
Meroon said... now that you know, you could delete this blog if you like. i'd hardly call it a blog. This might scare off potential readers if they see that you hunt your readers down and then wish them all the best.
9:43 AM --------------------------------------- Why call it a typo? Your criticism was heard and registered, and now you are trying to take it back in an obviously silly way which isn't fooling anyone. There is no need to iron out the wrinkles. It isn't necessary anyway; are you worried that you hurt me? Rest assured that I'm not.
I wrote 4 comments saying it was a typo.. and all these times i was lying ? n y did i lie, u r saying i lied cuz im worried dat i'd hurt you ? if i was worried that i'd hurt you, i wud never have written it. that's why i didn't write it. it was a typo.
i'll be honest with you, i got really mad when i read your last comment. i literally prevented myself from writing anything. so i took my time in replying. do you know why i got mad ? you have so much faith in your judgment that you forget that your judgments are not always right. if you say things without reevaluating your judgments and realizing that the opposite can be possible you end up hurting people. You have the audacity to call me a liar just because it seems like it ? dude, wake up.. a casual fun debate is cool, but this is ridiculous. Is this u or is this a purdue version of you ? have u been baptized by “Mr Misjudge-mental” ? I do expect you to speak up...
Ofcourse you DO expect me to speak up. It would be unlikely that I wouldn't since I've been persistently replying here. But that wasn't the point of saying "I do expect you to speak up..." was it? Here comes dramatization (rhetorical questions, puns, dramatic pause, "dude wake up") and emotions ("i got really mad", "audacity to call me a liar", "hurting people", "have faith in your judgement", and finally the stab at my university - like it could have anything to do with this).
So, translating without the emotion inducing language (I admit, it does distract you quite a bit) here's what your message comes down to:
you have so much faith in your judgment that you forget that your judgments are not always right. if you say things without reevaluating your judgments and realizing that the opposite can be possible you end up hurting people. You have [sic] call me a liar because it seems like it ?
Seems? No it was unlikely that someone could have made a typo when there's an option to delete it and reread it; besides the entire comment is lopsided when "blog" is replaced with "post".
Let me take my stab at dramatizing events a little bit: it "makes me mad" to see that someone is criticising and also playing nice and cute about it. You said I should delete my blog because it serves no real purpose. Stick to that why don't you? After your last comment, it does seem even more likely that you meant "blog". How does me going to Purdue change me into being judgemental? Why get "baptized" and why pun on Misjudge Mental? Because you are playing to your advantage! Why, what else is a better move than trying to cast me into the quite memorized role of Girl Goes Abroad And Changes Into Snob role! And how snide is calling me "mental"? Why not just say it in a clear sentence, so that when and if I ever confront you with it (God forbid), there's no ambiguity. And ofcourse, you didn't miss including the "How dare you call me a liar!" line (a little altered: audacity). It immediately makes one feel that here is a feared and pure being. Which COULD be ofcourse. But why do I have to have audacity to call you a liar? And why does liar have to sound like a "label" (like the N word rhymes with Ligger)? Hence you "call" me mental, ridiculous, unconscious (wake up!), judgemental, snobbish and unthoughtful because I "called" you a liar. You ofcourse being more indirect and dramatic about it than I am, and probably gaining sympathy from an audience too - should there be any.
It could have been a typo, doesn't matter either ways, what's interesting is how quick you are to switch from making attempts at being funny, to challenging me to do something as foolhardy as *gasp* speak up.
from a reader's stand point - cool post. i'd definitely put my bets on your side in this conversation cuz ur writing is cool. I wish i cud write like u do. i am dramatic. strange that i didn't see it. I c it now. will try to be less. [not being sarcastic]
i noticed it late that i'd made a typo. I saw it after your post titled "F..U..C..K". Since u already sed the F word, I wanted to see what else u wud come up with. After ur last post (which was quite impressive), i thot i shud let u know and see ur reaction to that. It was a good decision. else we wouldn't have this thing going on here which was fine until this u-turn in our conversation.
When you were in bd n regular in blogging, I was one of your loyal readers. Me, suf, and im sure many others, we loved what u wrote. U know that. Then why would i tell u to delete this blog ? I didn't.
Ok how did purdue change you into being judgmental and calling u mental, unconscious ? Well, thinKK. Something must have gone wrong somewhere. You have a friend (that's me - n im in the third person here.) back in bd. Im guessing u guys were sorta good buddies. You go abroad. You still communicate with him for quite a while. Then dhoom. you decide to cut of communication. Why not stop communication right after you go abroad? You had that option. NO, you wait for a while cuz everythingz normal. then something happens, n you decide, "ok, its time." what else am i suppose to make out of this. u have been baptized by something or someone, hence i sed "mental" n "unconscious" cuz one has to be a little mental and unconscious to pull out a trick like that. n "purdue version" cuz u've been baptized there.
Ok why did i call u ridiculous, unthotful ? because calling some1 a liar is putting him under a label. u had known me for over a year. u know that i dont lie n i am open. if i have to make a comment, i make it. that's why u always used to ask me for my comments about ur blog, its outlook, about what i thought about an essay u wrote, remember?. and here u r calling me a liar even after i say it was a typo in 4 comments. i think that is being unthotful and being ridiculous.
Oh so you called me judgemental and unconscious based on what happened a year back, not based on what I wrote over here? That explains a lot. So I disappeared, but I didn't disappear without an email. Things weren't supposed to be the same after the last conversation in bd. Fine, so I took some time before disappearing. You're assuming that someone else made me decide that, but it was all me. And no, Purdue has nothing to do with that either. I realize you mentioned that to bring some drama into your comment. But IT was all me. I decided that. If you have any questions about it still, you could ask me, why did you decide to disappear later rather than sooner? That is not "unconscious". "Mental" is a relative word. And you didn't explain why you called me "judgemental".
Yes you called my response impressive and cool. Yes you harked back to the days when you were "a loyal reader" and I would ask for your honest opinion. Yes about your reputation for being "honest". But that's history. Based on the facts as of NOW, based on your third comment on this post, it does seem like a typo doesn't happen twice in a row.
Other supporting evidence, you seem to have a history of getting riled by something, and then harking back to your reputation and saying things like "how dare you". If I called you a liar and you know that I was wrong, who cares? Just as I know that I'm not any of those 6 labels you attached to me.
well, certain words trigger certain uncontrollable emotions in me. This is a weak point i admit. Being called a liar is one word that makes me upset and hence comes -
'how dare you' - or rather - 'u have the audacity...'
Another word that upsets me is the word 'dishonesty.' U sed -
'Yes about your reputation for being "honest". But that's history.' This upsets me too.
Yes you are right about saying that i shouldn't care when people call me something i am not. just the way you dont care about me calling you, 6 u say, labels. true, but that's when you dont care about the person giving u the labels. nehow, not trying to create drama here. And i called u judgmental cuz u r judging me and calling me dishonest as no one can make typo twice in a row according to u.. isn't that being judgmental?
Agreeing to disagree is all I'm saying. And now that this whole thing has turned into a gigantic swirl of FEELINGS, I think it's good for all of us if we end it right here. The end.
Yea, it is. Unlike a fake typo, when someone makes a real typo, sees it posted like i did, notices it, they correct it right away.. not DAYS later when they feel like they should try to play dumb and be nice or something. Do you know what I mean?
that is a good argument on the surface, but responding late to a typo = fake typo is not a good argument at all. its called misjudgment. typoz r only natural. typo twice in a row is rare but not fake.
Typo is short for typing error. If you wrote "posty" or "poste" or something, that would have been a typo. But writing another word in its place that makes sense and goes with the overall mood of the comment, is NOT a typing error. In addition to the aforementioned reasons, there is no doubt that that was not a typo at all.
"Typo is short for typing error." TRUE. "If you wrote "posty" or "poste" or something, that would have been a typo." TRUE. "But writing another word in its place ... is NOT a typing error" NOT TRUE. Writing a different word by mistake is also a typing error when the words are somewhat similar. Writing blog but meaning post is a typo. There are people who use the word blog to mean post too. But that's a different argument whether its right to use "blog" instead of "post." May be its grammatically wrong but it is used. Besides, why would any1 ask an author to delete his/her blog when that person was a loyal reader? Give me one reason.
Because that person has a habit of breaking into an emotional outburst when confronted, as evidenced and as confessed by the person himself. What I mean is, it seems like you had a reaction to "my following who comes to my blog", and decided to say things like "delete your blog" (quote: well, certain words trigger certain uncontrollable emotions in me.)
I'm tired of regurgitating the same things. I stand by what I see to be obvious. If you want to argue about it, continue, but I'm not repeating myself anymore.
Oh really. Let's suppose blog and post ARE used interchangeably. When such a word has been defined by someone to mean one of those variable meanings, then the conversation that follows also assumes that particular meaning. The variable meaning doesn't remain variable anymore, it becomes fixed.
The entire exchange of comments to this blog post began with me defining the meaning of "blog" (assuming blog has two different meanings). How? I was the one who posed the question to my Stalker (who turned out to be you) the question:
"You've been coming to my blog everyday..How did you know to check my other blog after three years of inactivity?"
blog's meaning was defined. fine. but it is called a typing error for a particular and obvious reason, the reason being - TYPING ERROR ITSELF. i made a mistake alright. i made a typo. it was a BIG typo. try asking a random person will u - "blog" vs "post". just try it.
Read my last response again, I said ASSUMING that they were interchangeable words, blog's meaning was defined, so it is highly unlikely, nay, impossible that you could have made a "typo" on that.
Okay the odds are heavily against it, but it is impossible that you beat the odds on all the other points as well:
- using a word that makes sense - using an interchangeable word even tho it was defined - you admittedly saying that you make emotional reactions - you not correcting your "typo" right away but days later
try reading mine again. i explained typoz meaning yet again with capitalized alphabets. the word was "defined" u said, i responded saying "FINE". but then i sed "datz why it is called a typo. a big one. how can an author's following up on who comes to his/her blog be the reason for a reader, a loyal one, to ask the author to delete the blog ? it can't. "Mental check up required... 911 !!! please hurray.. nOOOooo, hurRRyyYY.. aaAAAaaa.. "
I should be saying that to you, why would you ask me to delete a blog just because you feel threatened? I did address that in another blog post "Commentary". But then again, I'm also open to the idea that some people are just "emotionally unstable". So, it's okay, you were offended that I found out who my stalker is, then reacted by saying I should delete my blog because my other readers would see it (eh?) and then, proceeded to take that back after a month in this long and pointless "debate".
eh.. u say ? eh is what i say .. u didn't find out who i was, i told u. so there is NO reason to react and ask u to delete your blog. but the only correct and true explanation is that being a loyal reader i wouldn't want ur other readers to freak out on u asking "who are you?". and also this post seemed like a drop of lemon in a glass of milk. it didn't fit with this blog writing thingy. hence i sed you can delete this post (and this is where i made the big typo) so that your blog stays clean (the lemon and milk analogy, cudn't think of a cooler one.. ahem).
So here again, you are back to emotional rationalizing. In plain words, it turns into:
u didn't find out who i was, i told u. so there is NO reason to react and ask u to delete your blog. i wouldn't want ur other readers to freak out on u asking "who are you?". it didn't fit with this blog writing thingy. hence i sed you can delete this post (and this is where i made the big typo) so that your blog stays clean
and this debate was not pointless.
----------------
It makes even more sense to say, that you decided to come out because you didn't know if I knew for sure who you were (what if I did? I could trace out the IP address. Besides, I can also check the links you clicked, and you clicked "Meroon"). So you decided to come out before I revealed you first.
Next as you said, you are prone to emotional reactions, and in a fit of emotional outburst, you asked me to "Why don't you delete your blog? There is no point to this blog anyway." This reaction goes really well with your history ("How dare you call me a liar!" Also, just so you could call me something "mental" and "unconscious", you referred to something entirely unrelated - so emotional.)
As the writer of this blog, I explicitly said that there are no other readers, and even then you asked me to delete my BLOG because "potential readers" might be scared off. Only emotionally charged people in the throes of an emotionally charged comment can look over such an obvious thing. I said there were no other readers already! You obviously wanted to say that my blog serves no purpose apart from scaring off potential readers so why not delete it?
And this debate was pointless because all your arguments are void.
"It makes even more sense to say, that you decided to come out because you didn't know if I knew for sure who you were (what if I did? I could trace out the IP address."
If you could have found out the IP address so wat ? you would have to compare it with my one to claim my name. for that u would already have to know it first to compare it. but u dont know it. it wud be just another ip address that you discovered. right ?
Your argument #2 -
" Next as you said, you are prone to emotional reactions, and in a fit of emotional outburst, you asked me to "Why don't you delete your blog? There is no point to this blog anyway." This reaction goes really well with your history ("How dare you call me a liar!".... "
If it was an emotional outburst i would have written it in the first comment of this post. I didn't. in my first comment i revealed my name and gave a valid reason. then you replied with a very polite comment. and it was the third comment where i made the typo. Your second comment was too polite to have triggered any sort of emotional outburst. right?
so now what, you wud give an argument of suppressed emotional outburst ? oh please!! so do u see whose argument is void ?
i also use site meter in one of my blogs. They provide u with interesting info, - browser details, os, monitor resolution n color depth, country, city + much more fun details. but that's it. its all fun details. n if i remember correct, i clicked Meroon, but also few others too - mashrur, mushfiq, farzeen, naadia, sufi, anik . oh, isn't that all the names in the list ?? check it out. n one more thing. there are no other readers now, but it wud be up n running at some point. that's why being a loyal reader, i made that comment.
I have your the IP address stored from your previous visits to my blog. I could compare it to that IP address ofcourse. You clicked on Meroon on your first visit and then the others. Sitemeter shows outclicks too.
There's really nothing to beat. The last post was my hypothetical scenario in response to your hypothetical scenario, and you haven't really said anything to change my mind about it. Yes it does seem like you would make an emotional reaction like that because of your subsequent reactions to things I've said.
im fine but am quite upset about michael's death. i was looking forward to his concert. btw, how are the people in your neighborhood taking his death? are they all talking about it ? people are listening to his songs all over again. currently in the Amazon.co.uk sales chart, top 20 albums ar moddhe 14 tai or. what is ur reaction ?
Paradoxically, there has not been so much hoopla about it. Everyone knows that MJ is dead, everyone knows that everyone knows MJ is dead. We don't even mention it to each other because the facts are THAT obvious. It's so obvious that MJ is dead and that everyone's sad about it that no one mentions it.
did you hear about swine flu cases in bd has risen to 16? these gov officials never take actions before things go wrong.. its only now that they are talking about creating awareness programs. SOBS !
Hi there. I don't think I can ever write again, atleast not in the near future. If I do, they will turn out to be more factual than philosophical. I didn't know that you followed my blog. You are very talented, goes without saying. Those are some wicked ink sketches. Do you study in art?
72 Comments:
Hey. Its just a coincidence that we started writing at around the same time. That's how i knew.
Hey Meroon. I've not really 'started' writing as you can see. You're basically the only reader. Well keep writing, and my bests to you. :)
now that you know, you could delete this blog if you like. i'd hardly call it a blog. This might scare off potential readers if they see that you hunt your readers down and then wish them all the best.
btw, its already late but I should tell you that I made a typo... I did not mean to say -
"you could delete this blog if you like". I actually meant-
"you could delete this post if you like"
nehow...
your correction (to the typo) doesn't really go with the next sentence: i'd hardly call it a blog. did you mean to say "i'd hardly call it a post" too?
yes.. that too.... i didn't mean to say:
"I'd hardly call it a blog" I actually meant -
"I'd hardly call it a post"
I had "post" in my mind but ended up writing "blog".
Or, it wasn't you who wrote that comment altogether!
Or, it can be that you want it to be me!
It looks like a setup; I probably *made* you write that stuff!
Or, it can be that you have Hexakosioihexekontahexaphobia or possibly Alliumphobia.
What, you give up ? That's the end of it ?
FYI -
Hexakosioihexekontahexaphobia means fear of number 666
Alliumphobia means fear of garlic
btw, how are you ?
Yea and if you conclude with something completely illogical, the issue will be forgotten. The issue being, the certain habit of certain people to say others have done what they have done. So you tell me how I am, maybe that will also answer the question how you are.
i really made two typos.. wanted to write "post" both the times. since even after saying this you didn't seem to believe me, i wrote -
"Or, it can be that you want it to be me!".
this gives you yet another reason to hate me or not want to talk to me. So possibly for that you want it to be me. But then you wrote -
"It looks like a setup; I probably *made* you write that stuff!"
May be you feel I had latent hatred for you hidden deep in my subconscious and it came out with that comment. So in that way, you made me write it which is completely false cuz its not true.
Ok, all that sed, either im right(which i hope i am not) or im completely on a different page. In that case, do speak up.
btw, I asked "how are you?" cuz i really wanna know.
This seems heavy. I'm not aware of your "latent hatred" seeded "deep in [your] subconscious" yet but, I said:
"It looks like a setup; I probably *made* you write that stuff!"
because it seems u were gonna pull another Stalker-post-esque trick. Which is, stalking me, and then saying i hunted you down and terrorized you. On that vein, it seems natural to assume that, you would write "you shud delete your blog", then later turn it around to saying that I made you write that post. In other words, I make you do or I do what YOU do. Clear? Let me know if it confuses you. I'll be glad to break it down even further.
I am fine.
Actually, I will start writing in a few days because the situation I will be in is pretty interesting. It should be interesting for a reader too so check back next week.
so u'r ganna stai stubburn an kepo callin me a stolka ain't it ? so im a craizy complicaited stolka ... o wow, naw i evn saund lyc one. ok,,lets see what else i am.. how about u braik it daun evan furda. It confused me.
-----out of context begins-------
hear this out. its exciting. An Australian famous actor read a book written by a Bangladeshi. He loved it and wrote a letter to the author without any reply. However, he was on an auction one day and he met a woman. He asked her where she was from. She said from Bangladesh. He got all excited and said he read this book and is in love with the author and his work. She said she is his (the author's) personal secretary. Then finally he got to meet the author in NY and they sat and talked for several hours. The actor is HUGH JACKMAN and the book was Dr Yunus's autobiography. Cool aint it ?
-----out of context ends-------
You should have thought of that before you started this. You were the one who called me a stalker for wondering about my site traffic stats, saying that I should delete my blog because you felt hunted down and terrorized. Would the real stalker please stand up? Thank you.
accha, typo + typo = twipo... twipo twipo twipo twipo twipo twipo twipo twipo.. do i have to dance naked on the streets or regurgitate the ice cream that i just had or cook for the not needy to make u believe that it was a twipo ? name it !!
---out of context begins again-------
how is Purdue coming along ? studies, daily life ?
---out of context ends again---------
I think you should just own up, stand by what you said, instead of hiding under the possibility that a human error could have been made. It's just too convenient. Way too convenient.
Purdue is good. Studies and daily life is good too.
so you think i am just taking the easy way out ?
I'm sorry if I was vague: You are taking the easy way out
Meroon said...
now that you know, you could delete this blog if you like. i'd hardly call it a blog. This might scare off potential readers if they see that you hunt your readers down and then wish them all the best.
9:43 AM
---------------------------------------
Why call it a typo? Your criticism was heard and registered, and now you are trying to take it back in an obviously silly way which isn't fooling anyone. There is no need to iron out the wrinkles. It isn't necessary anyway; are you worried that you hurt me? Rest assured that I'm not.
I wrote 4 comments saying it was a typo.. and all these times i was lying ? n y did i lie, u r saying i lied cuz im worried dat i'd hurt you ? if i was worried that i'd hurt you, i wud never have written it. that's why i didn't write it. it was a typo.
i'll be honest with you, i got really mad when i read your last comment. i literally prevented myself from writing anything. so i took my time in replying. do you know why i got mad ? you have so much faith in your judgment that you forget that your judgments are not always right. if you say things without reevaluating your judgments and realizing that the opposite can be possible you end up hurting people. You have the audacity to call me a liar just because it seems like it ? dude, wake up.. a casual fun debate is cool, but this is ridiculous. Is this u or is this a purdue version of you ? have u been baptized by “Mr Misjudge-mental” ?
I do expect you to speak up...
Ofcourse you DO expect me to speak up. It would be unlikely that I wouldn't since I've been persistently replying here. But that wasn't the point of saying "I do expect you to speak up..." was it? Here comes dramatization (rhetorical questions, puns, dramatic pause, "dude wake up") and emotions ("i got really mad", "audacity to call me a liar", "hurting people", "have faith in your judgement", and finally the stab at my university - like it could have anything to do with this).
So, translating without the emotion inducing language (I admit, it does distract you quite a bit) here's what your message comes down to:
you have so much faith in your judgment that you forget that your judgments are not always right. if you say things without reevaluating your judgments and realizing that the opposite can be possible you end up hurting people. You have [sic] call me a liar because it seems like it ?
Seems? No it was unlikely that someone could have made a typo when there's an option to delete it and reread it; besides the entire comment is lopsided when "blog" is replaced with "post".
Let me take my stab at dramatizing events a little bit: it "makes me mad" to see that someone is criticising and also playing nice and cute about it. You said I should delete my blog because it serves no real purpose. Stick to that why don't you? After your last comment, it does seem even more likely that you meant "blog". How does me going to Purdue change me into being judgemental? Why get "baptized" and why pun on Misjudge Mental? Because you are playing to your advantage! Why, what else is a better move than trying to cast me into the quite memorized role of Girl Goes Abroad And Changes Into Snob role! And how snide is calling me "mental"? Why not just say it in a clear sentence, so that when and if I ever confront you with it (God forbid), there's no ambiguity. And ofcourse, you didn't miss including the "How dare you call me a liar!" line (a little altered: audacity). It immediately makes one feel that here is a feared and pure being. Which COULD be ofcourse. But why do I have to have audacity to call you a liar? And why does liar have to sound like a "label" (like the N word rhymes with Ligger)? Hence you "call" me mental, ridiculous, unconscious (wake up!), judgemental, snobbish and unthoughtful because I "called" you a liar. You ofcourse being more indirect and dramatic about it than I am, and probably gaining sympathy from an audience too - should there be any.
It could have been a typo, doesn't matter either ways, what's interesting is how quick you are to switch from making attempts at being funny, to challenging me to do something as foolhardy as *gasp* speak up.
from a reader's stand point - cool post. i'd definitely put my bets on your side in this conversation cuz ur writing is cool. I wish i cud write like u do. i am dramatic. strange that i didn't see it. I c it now. will try to be less. [not being sarcastic]
i noticed it late that i'd made a typo. I saw it after your post titled "F..U..C..K". Since u already sed the F word, I wanted to see what else u wud come up with. After ur last post (which was quite impressive), i thot i shud let u know and see ur reaction to that. It was a good decision. else we wouldn't have this thing going on here which was fine until this u-turn in our conversation.
When you were in bd n regular in blogging, I was one of your loyal readers. Me, suf, and im sure many others, we loved what u wrote. U know that. Then why would i tell u to delete this blog ? I didn't.
Ok how did purdue change you into being judgmental and calling u mental, unconscious ? Well, thinKK. Something must have gone wrong somewhere. You have a friend (that's me - n im in the third person here.) back in bd. Im guessing u guys were sorta good buddies. You go abroad. You still communicate with him for quite a while. Then dhoom. you decide to cut of communication. Why not stop communication right after you go abroad? You had that option. NO, you wait for a while cuz everythingz normal. then something happens, n you decide, "ok, its time." what else am i suppose to make out of this. u have been baptized by something or someone, hence i sed "mental" n "unconscious" cuz one has to be a little mental and unconscious to pull out a trick like that. n "purdue version" cuz u've been baptized there.
Ok why did i call u ridiculous, unthotful ? because calling some1 a liar is putting him under a label. u had known me for over a year. u know that i dont lie n i am open. if i have to make a comment, i make it. that's why u always used to ask me for my comments about ur blog, its outlook, about what i thought about an essay u wrote, remember?. and here u r calling me a liar even after i say it was a typo in 4 comments. i think that is being unthotful and being ridiculous.
ur turn lady.
I'll reply in three days' time.
accha.. tc
wats up? vacation ? exam ?
Oh so you called me judgemental and unconscious based on what happened a year back, not based on what I wrote over here? That explains a lot. So I disappeared, but I didn't disappear without an email. Things weren't supposed to be the same after the last conversation in bd. Fine, so I took some time before disappearing. You're assuming that someone else made me decide that, but it was all me. And no, Purdue has nothing to do with that either. I realize you mentioned that to bring some drama into your comment. But IT was all me. I decided that. If you have any questions about it still, you could ask me, why did you decide to disappear later rather than sooner? That is not "unconscious". "Mental" is a relative word. And you didn't explain why you called me "judgemental".
Yes you called my response impressive and cool. Yes you harked back to the days when you were "a loyal reader" and I would ask for your honest opinion. Yes about your reputation for being "honest". But that's history. Based on the facts as of NOW, based on your third comment on this post, it does seem like a typo doesn't happen twice in a row.
Other supporting evidence, you seem to have a history of getting riled by something, and then harking back to your reputation and saying things like "how dare you". If I called you a liar and you know that I was wrong, who cares? Just as I know that I'm not any of those 6 labels you attached to me.
well, certain words trigger certain uncontrollable emotions in me. This is a weak point i admit. Being called a liar is one word that makes me upset and hence comes -
'how dare you' - or rather - 'u have the audacity...'
Another word that upsets me is the word 'dishonesty.' U sed -
'Yes about your reputation for being "honest". But that's history.' This upsets me too.
Yes you are right about saying that i shouldn't care when people call me something i am not. just the way you dont care about me calling you, 6 u say, labels. true, but that's when you dont care about the person giving u the labels. nehow, not trying to create drama here.
And i called u judgmental cuz u r judging me and calling me dishonest as no one can make typo twice in a row according to u.. isn't that being judgmental?
Agreeing to disagree is all I'm saying. And now that this whole thing has turned into a gigantic swirl of FEELINGS, I think it's good for all of us if we end it right here. The end.
"We agree that neither of us agree with either of our labels which brings an end to our disagreement."
Now wat ?
Now nothing.
how is ur new apartment ?
If you read "my new apartment", you've also ready the "I love" part right beside it.
*read
that's only obvious aint it.
Yes it obviously is.
u just made a typo.. is that possible ?
Yea, it is. Unlike a fake typo, when someone makes a real typo, sees it posted like i did, notices it, they correct it right away.. not DAYS later when they feel like they should try to play dumb and be nice or something. Do you know what I mean?
that is a good argument on the surface, but responding late to a typo = fake typo is not a good argument at all. its called misjudgment. typoz r only natural. typo twice in a row is rare but not fake.
Typo is short for typing error. If you wrote "posty" or "poste" or something, that would have been a typo. But writing another word in its place that makes sense and goes with the overall mood of the comment, is NOT a typing error. In addition to the aforementioned reasons, there is no doubt that that was not a typo at all.
"Typo is short for typing error." TRUE. "If you wrote "posty" or "poste" or something, that would have been a typo." TRUE. "But writing another word in its place ... is NOT a typing error" NOT TRUE. Writing a different word by mistake is also a typing error when the words are somewhat similar. Writing blog but meaning post is a typo. There are people who use the word blog to mean post too. But that's a different argument whether its right to use "blog" instead of "post." May be its grammatically wrong but it is used. Besides, why would any1 ask an author to delete his/her blog when that person was a loyal reader? Give me one reason.
btw, u can randomly ask a person whether he/she sometimes uses "blog" to mean "post" by mistake or intentionally..
Because that person has a habit of breaking into an emotional outburst when confronted, as evidenced and as confessed by the person himself. What I mean is, it seems like you had a reaction to "my following who comes to my blog", and decided to say things like "delete your blog" (quote: well, certain words trigger certain uncontrollable emotions in me.)
I'm tired of regurgitating the same things. I stand by what I see to be obvious. If you want to argue about it, continue, but I'm not repeating myself anymore.
Oh really. Let's suppose blog and post ARE used interchangeably. When such a word has been defined by someone to mean one of those variable meanings, then the conversation that follows also assumes that particular meaning. The variable meaning doesn't remain variable anymore, it becomes fixed.
The entire exchange of comments to this blog post began with me defining the meaning of "blog" (assuming blog has two different meanings). How? I was the one who posed the question to my Stalker (who turned out to be you) the question:
"You've been coming to my blog everyday..How did you know to check my other blog after three years of inactivity?"
Blog's meaning was defined.
blog's meaning was defined. fine. but it is called a typing error for a particular and obvious reason, the reason being - TYPING ERROR ITSELF. i made a mistake alright. i made a typo. it was a BIG typo. try asking a random person will u - "blog" vs "post". just try it.
Read my last response again, I said ASSUMING that they were interchangeable words, blog's meaning was defined, so it is highly unlikely, nay, impossible that you could have made a "typo" on that.
Okay the odds are heavily against it, but it is impossible that you beat the odds on all the other points as well:
- using a word that makes sense
- using an interchangeable word even tho it was defined
- you admittedly saying that you make emotional reactions
- you not correcting your "typo" right away but days later
try reading mine again. i explained typoz meaning yet again with capitalized alphabets. the word was "defined" u said, i responded saying "FINE". but then i sed "datz why it is called a typo. a big one. how can an author's following up on who comes to his/her blog be the reason for a reader, a loyal one, to ask the author to delete the blog ? it can't. "Mental check up required... 911 !!! please hurray.. nOOOooo, hurRRyyYY.. aaAAAaaa.. "
lol... i mean yours not mine..
I should be saying that to you, why would you ask me to delete a blog just because you feel threatened? I did address that in another blog post "Commentary". But then again, I'm also open to the idea that some people are just "emotionally unstable". So, it's okay, you were offended that I found out who my stalker is, then reacted by saying I should delete my blog because my other readers would see it (eh?) and then, proceeded to take that back after a month in this long and pointless "debate".
eh.. u say ? eh is what i say .. u didn't find out who i was, i told u. so there is NO reason to react and ask u to delete your blog. but the only correct and true explanation is that being a loyal reader i wouldn't want ur other readers to freak out on u asking "who are you?". and also this post seemed like a drop of lemon in a glass of milk. it didn't fit with this blog writing thingy. hence i sed you can delete this post (and this is where i made the big typo) so that your blog stays clean (the lemon and milk analogy, cudn't think of a cooler one.. ahem).
and this debate was not pointless.
So here again, you are back to emotional rationalizing. In plain words, it turns into:
u didn't find out who i was, i told u. so there is NO reason to react and ask u to delete your blog. i wouldn't want ur other readers to freak out on u asking "who are you?". it didn't fit with this blog writing thingy. hence i sed you can delete this post (and this is where i made the big typo) so that your blog stays clean
and this debate was not pointless.
----------------
It makes even more sense to say, that you decided to come out because you didn't know if I knew for sure who you were (what if I did? I could trace out the IP address. Besides, I can also check the links you clicked, and you clicked "Meroon"). So you decided to come out before I revealed you first.
Next as you said, you are prone to emotional reactions, and in a fit of emotional outburst, you asked me to "Why don't you delete your blog? There is no point to this blog anyway." This reaction goes really well with your history ("How dare you call me a liar!" Also, just so you could call me something "mental" and "unconscious", you referred to something entirely unrelated - so emotional.)
As the writer of this blog, I explicitly said that there are no other readers, and even then you asked me to delete my BLOG because "potential readers" might be scared off. Only emotionally charged people in the throes of an emotionally charged comment can look over such an obvious thing. I said there were no other readers already! You obviously wanted to say that my blog serves no purpose apart from scaring off potential readers so why not delete it?
And this debate was pointless because all your arguments are void.
i share your fighting spirit ... will call it a day tho. will respond soon. tc. enjoy your new apartment.
This comment has been removed by the author.
my arguments are void ? lol. ok, keep reading --
Your argument #1 -
"It makes even more sense to say, that you decided to come out because you didn't know if I knew for sure who you were (what if I did? I could trace out the IP address."
If you could have found out the IP address so wat ? you would have to compare it with my one to claim my name. for that u would already have to know it first to compare it. but u dont know it. it wud be just another ip address that you discovered. right ?
Your argument #2 -
" Next as you said, you are prone to emotional reactions, and in a fit of emotional outburst, you asked me to "Why don't you delete your blog? There is no point to this blog anyway." This reaction goes really well with your history ("How dare you call me a liar!".... "
If it was an emotional outburst i would have written it in the first comment of this post. I didn't. in my first comment i revealed my name and gave a valid reason. then you replied with a very polite comment. and it was the third comment where i made the typo. Your second comment was too polite to have triggered any sort of emotional outburst. right?
so now what, you wud give an argument of suppressed emotional outburst ? oh please!! so do u see whose argument is void ?
i also use site meter in one of my blogs. They provide u with interesting info, - browser details, os, monitor resolution n color depth, country, city + much more fun details. but that's it. its all fun details. n if i remember correct, i clicked Meroon, but also few others too - mashrur, mushfiq, farzeen, naadia, sufi, anik . oh, isn't that all the names in the list ?? check it out. n one more thing. there are no other readers now, but it wud be up n running at some point. that's why being a loyal reader, i made that comment.
my arguments are void u say, beat this now.
"Seribu juta topan badai dan kutu busuk!"
I have your the IP address stored from your previous visits to my blog. I could compare it to that IP address ofcourse. You clicked on Meroon on your first visit and then the others. Sitemeter shows outclicks too.
There's really nothing to beat. The last post was my hypothetical scenario in response to your hypothetical scenario, and you haven't really said anything to change my mind about it. Yes it does seem like you would make an emotional reaction like that because of your subsequent reactions to things I've said.
I'm done repeating.
this is kind of getting repetitive n boring. We cud again agree in our disagreement.
now what ? I wish we had something else to talk or argue about.
hi. howz it going?
It's fine meroon. Thanks for asking. I hope things are swell with you too.
im fine but am quite upset about michael's death. i was looking forward to his concert. btw, how are the people in your neighborhood taking his death? are they all talking about it ? people are listening to his songs all over again. currently in the Amazon.co.uk sales chart, top 20 albums ar moddhe 14 tai or. what is ur reaction ?
Paradoxically, there has not been so much hoopla about it. Everyone knows that MJ is dead, everyone knows that everyone knows MJ is dead. We don't even mention it to each other because the facts are THAT obvious. It's so obvious that MJ is dead and that everyone's sad about it that no one mentions it.
lol..
did you hear about swine flu cases in bd has risen to 16? these gov officials never take actions before things go wrong.. its only now that they are talking about creating awareness programs. SOBS !
aj k sufir birthday...
bolte hobena
ok, i will not tell you j aj k sufir birthday. happy ?
Ok Mahreen, bye. Take care.
You too.
cant remember whn i started reading the old blog u kept. but i did enjoy reading it.
hope u write again.
Hi there. I don't think I can ever write again, atleast not in the near future. If I do, they will turn out to be more factual than philosophical. I didn't know that you followed my blog. You are very talented, goes without saying. Those are some wicked ink sketches. Do you study in art?
Post a Comment
<< Home